Home
 
15 Feb
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

Gov. Chris Christie rolled out details Tuesday on his plan for bail reform, saying communities could be kept safer if violent offenders were kept locked up until their trials.

He proposed an amendment to the state constitution so that judges when deciding bail can consider the danger a defendant poses. Currently, the main purpose of bail is to ensure the defendant shows up in court.

The Republican governor’s proposals borrow from federal law. New Jersey’s constitution currently gives defendants the right to bail except in some capital offense cases.

“Keeping our residents and communities safe is the paramount role of government,” said Christie, flanked by six county prosecutors and Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa in a show of support for the changes at a news conference. “Revising our bail procedures and allowing judges to consider certain factors, such as the dangerousness of the offender to the community before being released back into society, is just a simple common sense reform that is long overdue in this state.”

“It will help protect the public; it will enable every county prosecutor to do what they need to do to keep their county safe,” said Monmouth County Prosecutor Peter E. Warshaw Jr., who was present at the news conference. “Without question, I can think of cases where we would have sought to hold someone without bail. Prosecutors will act wisely and with careful discretion to make that decision. It’s a necessary tool.”

Christie in his State of the State speech in January identified bail reform as one of his 2012 priorities. He said national statistics show that, in pretrial releases, about one-third of released defendants were charged with one or more types of pretrial misconduct.2012 priority

Christie in his State of the State speech in January identified bail reform as one of his 2012 priorities. He said national statistics show that, in pretrial releases, about one-third of released defendants were charged with one or more types of pretrial misconduct.

Since he began pushing bail reform, Christie said he hasn’t run into much opposition.

Alexander Shalom, policy counsel for the ACLU of New Jersey, agrees changes should be considered but only if packaged with a commitment to speedy trials.

Shalom also said judges denying bail must be sure the dangers posed by a defendant are real and the likelihood of conviction is almost certain. He also said the state should come up with a smarter plan than simply warehousing no-bail defendants in jail.

“The ACLU of New Jersey is pleased that the governor is reviewing our bail system, which is in dramatic need of reform,” said Shalom, adding, “There is nothing inherently problematic about aligning state court bail rules with the federal system’s rules.”

But because of the presumption of innocence, “we must ensure safeguards are in place,” Shalom said.

Democrats also said broader criminal justice fixes should be looked at.

“Bail reform is just one aspect of what can be done to tackle the increasing concerns about crime,” Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver, D-Essex, said. “What New Jersey truly needs is a comprehensive anti-crime package that also takes into account proper rehabilitation for nonviolent drug offenders, a commitment to anti-recidivism programs, (and) an open-minded look at what state aid cuts have done to police staffing throughout our state and anti-poverty efforts.”

An NJ Press Media review of 9,484 inmates at the Monmouth County Jail from May 2010 through January 2012 found that 297, or 3.1 percent, were charged with a violent crime after being released. Those include homicide, aggravated assault, arson, sex crimes, kidnapping, robbery and violent behavior. A total of 1,451 of the 9,484 inmates, or 15.3 percent, had repeat visits to the jail, the review found.

Chiesa said making the changes is a no-brainer.

“ If you’re the victim of a crime, you shouldn’t have to worry about whether or not a person is given bail without consideration if they pose a danger to you or your community,” he said.

This proposed constitutional amendment needs to be advanced by lawmakers and then would need voter approval.

Overview of Bail in New Jersey:

Bail is required to be set within twelve hours of the issuance of a complaint. All defendants have a right to bail under our New Jersey constitution. If bail is posted, defendants are released until the charges set forth in the complaint are resolved. Defendants can be required to post funds or property to assure that they will appear in court in the future. Put differently, bail is a promise to appear.

They may be required to deposit funds or property in exchange for a promise to appear. If defendants have significant ties to the community, or no criminal history, they may be considered for a Release on Own Recognizance, or R.O.R. This is an affidavit certifying that they are aware of the case against them and will appear in court to face the charges. Defendants may also be required to give a personal bond, which is a promise to appear or face a judgment, whereby a specified amount of money is forfeited.

Alternatively, some defendants choose to pay a bail bondsman to post funds on their behalf. These defendants may be ordered to post a higher bail, or have no bail set. As a result, these individuals will remain in jail until the case is over. If they are released and appear in court as required, bail money may be refunded in full upon case resolution or disposition. Once defendants are released, bail is discharged to the surety.

Bail investigations may be ordered by a Superior Court Judge of the Criminal Division. Criminal Division bail investigators or case supervisors gather information on the defendant’s ties or standing in the community. Identifying information is collected, including the names, addresses dates of birth, employment, criminal record, mental health and drug abuse history.
These investigations are conducted by professionals working for the court. They investigate and report on a defendant’s amenability to bail or bail supervision. Bail investigation reports consider the seriousness of the offense and the severity of punishment upon conviction, as well as the defendant’s family ties and financial status.

All of these factors are considered in light of the probability that the defendant will appear for trial or other court events. Case supervisors or bail investigators report to the Judge, who hears evidence from the defense and prosecution and decides the amount and form of bail to be set, if any.

The Mollo Law Firm, criminal defense lawyers, has experience handling bail matters and all criminal offenses at throughout New Jersey, including charges of theft, drug possession, DWI, assault, shoplifting and all other criminal and traffic matters. If you have any questions please contact our office at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com. You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com. Thank you.

From app.com, 2/15/12

 
13 Feb
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

An Ocean Township man was arrested Friday in a joint investigation of a fake ID scam, the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office said.

The man, Lucio Medina-Sanchez, was charged with three counts of second-degree manufacturing and sale of fraudulent government documents, Prosecutor Peter E. Warshaw Jr. said in a prepared statement.

According to Warshaw’s statement, Medina-Sanchez, 36, would use passport-size photos of his “customers,” along with a name and birth date, and create fake identification documents for sale. The county, as well as the Department of Homeland Security and local police, executed a search warrant on his Aldrin Road home Thursday morning and seized computers, laminates and other materials used to create the fakes, Warshaw said.

Medina-Sanchez was charged the following day. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years on each count, Warshaw said.

Medina-Sanchez is being held in the Monmouth County Jail, Freehold Township, in lieu of $250,000 bail. The Prosecutor’s Office declined to release his photo.

The Mollo Law Firm has experience handling cases of this nature in Ocean  Township and throughout New Jersey.  We represent clients in Courts throughout the state.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, New Jersey Fake ID cases.  We vigorously pursue all available legal options in an effort to obtain a favorable result.  We provide sophisticated energy and fresh ideas for every client, every day.  Please contact our office at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You can also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com for more information.  Thank you.

From app.com, 2/6/12

 
8 Feb
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

DWI in Sayreville?  It is imperative that you have an experienced Sayreville DWI attorney on your side.  The right DWI lawyer can make all the difference.  This law firm has extensive experience with DWI and DUI cases in Sayreville.  Our office is located just minutes from the Sayreville Municipal Court.

Drunk driving offenses in Sayreville are among the most serious charges an individual can face.  In addition to the severe penalties imposed by the Court, DWI defendants experience the embarrassment and stress associated with these potentially life-altering charges.

New Jersey has some of the toughest drunk driving laws in the country.  Individuals convicted of DWI in Sayreville face mandatory license suspension, fines, penalties and, in some cases, the imposition of an interlock device on their vehicle.   Individuals are also exposed to jail for a first and second offense, and mandatory jail for a third or subsequent offense.

If you or someone you know is charged with DWI in Sayreville, New Jersey, it is imperative that you have an experienced Sayreville DWI lawyer.   A trained attorney can review the evidence against you, recommend a legal strategy, arrange a plea bargain with the prosecutor or, if necessary, conduct a trial before the Judge.

The Mollo Law Firm, New Jersey DWI attorneys, has experience handling cases of this nature in Sayreville and throughout New Jersey.  We represent clients in Courts throughout the state.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, New Jersey DWI cases.  We vigorously pursue all available legal options in an effort to obtain a favorable result.  We provide sophisticated energy and fresh ideas for every client, every day.  Please contact our office at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You can also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com for more information.  Thank you.

 
5 Feb
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

New Jersey Police will be out in force today conducting DWI patrols throughout the state.  Super Bowl Sunday is considered one of the busiest DWI days of the year on the nation’s highways.  This is particularly relevant for New Jersey residents this year, with the Giants playing in the big game.  So drink responsibly today.  And whether you are popping the champagne to celebrate the thrill of victory, or crying in your beer suffering the agony of defeat, don’t get  behind the wheel.  Assign a designated driver or call a cab. 

The Mollo Law Firm, New Jersey DWI attorneys, has experience handling DWI cases of this nature throughout New Jersey.  We vigorously pursue all available legal options in an effort to obtain a favorable result.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, DWI cases.   If you or someone you know is facing DWI charges, please contact our offices for a free consultation.  You can reach us at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com.  Thank you.

Enjoy the game!

 
30 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

DWI in Manalapan?  It is imperative that you have an experienced Manalapan DWI attorney on your side.  The right DWI lawyer can make all the difference.  This law firm has extensive experience with DWI and DUI cases throughout New Jersey.  Our office is located just minutes from the Manalapan Municipal Court.

Drunk driving offenses in Manalapan are among the most serious charges an individual can face.  In addition to the severe penalties imposed by the Court, DWI defendants experience the embarrassment and stress associated with these potentially life-altering charges.

New Jersey has some of the toughest drunk driving laws in the country.  Individuals convicted of DWI in Manalapan face mandatory license suspension, fines, penalties and, in some cases, the imposition of an interlock device on their vehicle.   Individuals are also exposed to jail for a first and second offense, and mandatory jail for a third or subsequent offense.

If you or someone you know is charged with DWI in Manalapan, New Jersey, it is imperative that you have an experienced Manalapan DWI lawyer.   A trained attorney can review the evidence against you, recommend a legal strategy, arrange a plea bargain with the prosecutor or, if necessary, conduct a trial before the Judge.

The Mollo Law Firm, New Jersey DWI attorneys, has experience handling cases of this nature in Manalapan and throughout New Jersey.  We vigorously pursue all available legal options in an effort to obtain a favorable result.  We provide sophisticated energy and fresh ideas for every client, every day.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, DWI cases in Manalapan.  The right Manalapan DWI lawyer can make all the difference.  Contact our offices for a free consultation.  You can reach us at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com.  Thank you.

 
27 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

A Board of Education member who resigned days before being disqualified by the state said that he broke someone’s jaw when he was a teenager and that he is now “being punished” more than three decades after the fact.

Reached for comment Thursday, Steve Rogan, 49, of Poplar Street, said he resigned because of family health concerns and that he was disqualified by the state from serving on the board because of an incident that occurred in 1981, when he was a juvenile living in the borough.

“What happened was when I was 17, I broke somebody’s jaw, aggravated assault, and I didn’t go to court until I was 18, and that’s the reason I’m not allowed on the Board of Ed.,” Rogan said. “Thirty-one years ago I did something and I’m being punished by the government, by the governor.”

The Board of Education is looking to fill a vacancy following Rogan’s resignation. Rogan, who had served on the board since April of 2009, filed his letter of resignation on Jan. 4, according to Corey J. Lowell, business administrator and board secretary.

The board received a Jan. 5 letter from the state Department of Education Criminal History Review Unit stating that Rogan had not completed the fingerprinting process required for the criminal history background check. In a letter dated Jan. 10, the state told the board that Rogan “was disqualified from serving as a board member due to a disqualifying event,” Lowell said Wednesday.

Allison Kobus, a spokesperson for the state Department of Education, said Thursday that by law the state cannot disclose the results of a criminal background check.

The disqualification comes under a law signed by Gov. Chris Christie last May requiring all board members to comply with criminal background checks and step down if they have past convictions for a wide array of crimes. Kobus said there is no time limit for how far back in a board’s member’s past the convictions occurred.

Rogan isn’t the first school official in Monmouth County to step down under the law; last September, Asbury Park school board president Remond Palmer was permanently disqualified from serving on the board due to a 1989 cocaine possession conviction.

According to a post on the Keansburg school district’s website, the Board of Education is accepting applicants for Rogan’s seat on the board through Feb. 16, with interviews to be conducted Feb. 28 at the board’s regularly scheduled meeting at 7 p.m. at the Joseph Bolger Middle School, 100 Palmer Place. The term will run until November, when it will be placed on the ballot at the annual election, according to the notice.

This story is yet another example of why an expungement is so important.  Whenever a person is charged with a crime, he or she will have a “criminal record.”  Evidence of the criminal arrest will remain regardless of how the case is resolved.  As such, it is important for anyone who has been charged with a crime to consult an expungement attorney to discuss the expungement process.

Even if a case is dismissed, the criminal record including any fingerprints, photographs and the record of the charge/arrest remain on their record forever. If a defendant is convicted of the crime, it is even more important to assess eligibility for expungement.  An experienced expungement lawyer can help. Criminal records can follow a defendant long beyond the day he or she left the courthouse. Prospective employers, colleges and universities, insurance companies, landlords, adoption agencies, banks, and mortgage lenders routinely check these records for evidence of a criminal past.

The right to have an arrest or conviction expunged is rooted in New Jerseystatute.  The law provides that “expungement shall mean the extraction and isolation of all records on file.” N.J.S.A. 2C:52-1(a).  “If an order of expungement is granted, the arrest, conviction and any proceedings related thereto shall be deemed not to have occurred, and the petitioner may answer any questions relating to their occurrence accordingly.”  N.J.S.A. 2C:52-1(a).  The plain language of this statute reveals that, in nearly all instances, if you are questioned about the existence of an arrest or conviction you may legally deny that such an event ever took place.

The law also sets forth the public policy motivations behind the process: “This chapter shall be construed with the primary objective of providing relief to the one-time offender who has led a life of rectitude and disassociated himself with unlawful activity, but not to create a system whereby periodic violators of the law or those who associate themselves with criminal activity have a regular means of expunging their police records.”  N.J.S.A. 2C:52-52.

If the expungement is granted, “all records specified in the expungement order shall be removed from the files of the agencies…and shall be placed in the control of a person who has been designated by the head of each such agency.”  This is designed to “ensure that such records or the information contained therein are not related for any reason and are not utilized or referred to for any purposes.”  If someone were to make a request for information concerning your criminal record, “all noticed officers, departments and agencies shall reply, with respect to the arrest, conviction or related proceedings which are the subject of the order, that there is no record information.”  N.J.S.A. 2C:52-15.  Any person who reveals to another the existence of an arrest, conviction or related legal proceedings may be charged with a criminal disorderly persons offense.  N.J.S.A. 2C:52-30

This law firm has experience helping clients obtain expungements throughout New Jersey.   Al Mollo, Esq. recently in a television commercial explaining the benefits of a New Jersey expungement.  Please contact our office at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You can also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com for more information.  Thank you.

Source: app.com, 1/27/12

 

 
25 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

Tips for New Jersey Municipal Court

Most of us will eventually end up in a Municipal Court.  The process is not fun and often confusing for defendants.  Whether you are charged with a simple traffic ticket or a more serious offense like DWI, it is important that you keep certain things in mind to help make you experience in Court less stressful:

 1. Be on time.

One of the quickest ways to get on a Judge’s bad side is to be late.  This can adversely influence the Judge’s perception of you.  It can also result in more serious consequences, like an arrest warrant or monetary sanction.  Afford enough time to get to Court, factoring in traffic and time to park.  If you are unfamiliar with the area, you may want to do a “test run” prior to your Court date.

 2. Dress appropriately.

Be mindful of your audience when getting dressed for Court.  Of course, we all have different ideas of what looks “good.”  This is not to suggest that you abandon your individual sense of style.  However, some general rules should be kept in mind: avoid jeans, hats, provocative or revealing clothing, or anything that might be perceived to offend the dignity of the Court.

 3. Turn off your cell phone.

Few things upset Judges as much as cell phones ringing in Court.  Some Judges will give a dirty look, others a public scolding and some will even confiscate your phone.  So turn it off, put it on silent mode or leave it in the car.

 4. Be prepared to hurry up and wait.

The wheels of justice turn slowly.  Court sessions are very long and can last several hours. You should prepare mentally for this and make appropriate arrangements for other personal, employment and child care obligations.

 5. When in doubt, remain silent.

“You have the right to remain silent.  Anything you say can and will be used against you in a Court of law.”  These words have been branded in our minds from crime novels and television dramas.  Indeed, the right to remain silent is sacred.  Defendants should be very careful about making any statements whatsoever that relate to the charges.  Statements made to the Judge, prosecutor, court officers, co-defendants or any other individuals could, potentially, be used against you.  So be careful. Be quiet.

 6. Address the Judge respectfully.

Respect the robe.  Judges expect and deserve due deference.  Always address the Judge as “Your Honor.”  Small things like this go a long way.  Conversely, a Judge’s perception that a defendant is being disrespectful can derail the case in a hurry.

These are just a few things to keep in mind before your New Jersey Municipal Court appearance.  Of course, it is always in your best interest to consult an attorney.  A trained New Jersey Municipal Court lawyer can advise you of your rights and potential consequences.

The Mollo Law Firm, New Jersey DWI attorneys, has experience handling cases of this nature throughout New Jersey.  We represent clients in Courts throughout the state.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on New Jersey Municipal Court cases.  We vigorously pursue all available legal options in an effort to obtain a favorable result.  We provide sophisticated energy and fresh ideas for every client, every day.  Please contact our office at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You can also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com for more information.  Thank you.

 
24 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that police cannot put a GPS device on a suspect’s car to track his movements without a warrant, a test case that upholds basic privacy rights in the face of new surveillance technology.

The high court ruling was a defeat for the Obama administration, which had argued that a warrant was not required to use global positioning system devices to monitor a vehicle on public streets.

The justices unanimously upheld a precedent-setting ruling by a U.S. appeals court that the police must first obtain a warrant to use a GPS device for an extended period of time to covertly follow a suspect.

The high court ruled that placement of a device on a vehicle and using it to monitor the vehicle’s movements was covered by U.S. constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures of evidence.

There are no precise statistics on how often police in the United States use GPS tracking in criminal investigations. But the Obama administration told the court last year it was used sparingly by federal law enforcement officials.

The American Civil Liberties Union rights group hailed the ruling as an important victory for privacy. “While this case turned on the fact that the government physically placed a GPS device on the defendant’s car, the implications are much broader,” Steven Shapiro of the ACLU said.

“A majority of the court acknowledged that advancing technology, like cell phone tracking, gives the government unprecedented ability to collect, store, and analyze an enormous amount of information about our private lives,” he said.

SUSPECTED DRUG TRAFFICKER

The case began in 2005 when police officers went to a public parking lot in Maryland and secretly installed a GPS device on a Jeep Grand Cherokee used by a Washington, D.C. nightclub owner, Antoine Jones.

Jones was suspected of drug trafficking and the police tracked his movements for a month. The resulting evidence played a key role in his conviction for conspiring to distribute cocaine.

The appeals court had thrown out Jones’s conviction and his

life-in-prison sentence, and ruled prolonged electronic monitoring of the vehicle amounted to a search.

All nine justices agreed in upholding the appeals court decision, but at least four justices would have gone even further in finding fault not only with the attachment of the device, but also with the lengthy monitoring.

In summarizing the court’s majority opinion from the bench, Justice Antonin Scalia said attachment of the device by the police was a trespass and an improper intrusion of the kind that would have been considered a search when the Constitution was adopted some 220 years ago.

The administration argued that even if it were a search, it was lawful and reasonable under the Constitution. Scalia said his opinion did not decide that issue and some more difficult problems that may emerge in a future case, such as a six-month monitoring of a suspected terrorist.

Joining Scalia’s opinion were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor.

Sotomayor wrote separately to say the case raised difficult questions about individual privacy expectations in a digital age, but said the case could be decided on narrower grounds over the physical intrusion in attaching the device.

LONG-TERM MONITORING

Justice Samuel Alito wrote a separate opinion that Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan joined. He wrote that he would have decided the case by holding that Jones’s reasonable privacy expectations were violated by long-term monitoring of his vehicle’s movements.

Alito said in recent years many new devices have emerged that track a person’s movements, including video surveillance in some cities, automatic toll collection systems on roads, devices on cars that disclose their location, cell phones and other wireless devices.

“The availability and use of these and other new devices will continue to shape the average person’s expectations about the privacy of his or her daily movements,” he wrote.

One law professor said those four justices were clearly concerned about the potential impact of new technologies and believed extended monitoring likely required a warrant so law enforcement should “be on the safe side and get a warrant.”

“This is an indication that there are justices who are recognizing that privacy norms are shifting but the fact that people’s lives take place increasingly online does not mean that society has decided that there’s no such thing as privacy anymore,” said Joel Reidenberg, a law professor at Fordham University in New York.

The Supreme Court case is United States v. Antoine Jones, No. 10-1259.

We are experienced New Jersey criminal defense attorneys.  We will continue to monitor these important developments in criminal law.  We handle criminal cases throughout New Jersey.    We will defend your rights and vigorously pursue all available legal defenses.  Contact our offices for a free consultation.  You can reach us at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com.  Thank you.

From Reuters, 1/23/12

 
23 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

 

Charged with Drug Possession in Belmar?  
Drug crimes are among the most serious in New Jersey.  If convicted, defendants face potentially life-altering penalties, up to and including the imposition of a jail term.  As a result, if you are charged with a drug offense in Belmar, New Jersey, or anywhere else in the state, it is critical that you have an experienced Belmar, New Jersey criminal defense attorney representing you.  Our law firm is located just a few short minutes from the Belmar Municipal Court, and we have appeared on cases of this nature in Belmar.
Police in Belmar, New Jersey can bring charges for possession of any illegal drug or substance, including marijuana, hallucinogens, methamphetamines, heroin and cocaine.  Crimes in Belmar, NJ involving allegations of drug distribution are generally more serious and present more significant penalties.
Marijuana Charges
Marijuana charges are among the most common in Belmar, NJ and other New Jersey criminal courts.  A person can be charged in Belmar for possessing even seemingly miniscule amounts of the drug, including a seed or residue in a pipe.  Charges of this nature can result from motor vehicle stops, searches of person or property, police intervention in college parties, etc.  It is also common for individuals in Belmar, NJ to be charged with possession of drug paraphernalia in connection with marijuana cases.  These items can include pipes, bags, rolling papers, and other things.
The penalties for marijuana possession can be significant, including fines, loss of driving privileges, criminal record and, in some cases, jail.  First time offenders may be eligible for a diversionary program, such as a conditional discharge or pretrial intervention (PTI).
If you are charged with marijuana possession in Belmar, or anywhere else in New Jersey, it is important that you have an experienced Belmar, NJ drug possession lawyer.  These cases often involve complex legal issues, including search and seizure, chemical testing, custody of lab results and proof of actual possession.  Your Belmar marijuana possession attorney can review all of the evidence presented against you and recommend options for defense.
Prescription Drugs
Charges may also be brought in Belmar for unlawful possession of prescription drugs.  In fact, charges involving pharmaceutical drugs, such as pain killers, are becoming more common and widespread.  If an individual is found to be under the influence of prescription medication in Belmar for which he or she does not possess a prescription, such possession may result in criminal charges.  Penalties associated with these charges often hinge on the amount of the prescription drugs possessed.  For instance, a defendant convicted in Belmar of possessing five or more doses of a prescription drug may be charged with a fourth degree crime, which can result in up to 18 months in jail.  If the possession in Belmar consists of four or less doses, the defendant may be charged with a disorderly persons offense.
In order for an individual to obtain medication, he or she must first have a prescription from a licensed physician.  That prescription is then presented to a pharmacist, who is authorized to supply the medication. This routine process has resulted in criminal efforts to obtain and use prescription drug pads.  Such theft and prescription drug fraud is prosecuted just as seriously as other drug charges.  These crimes are generally brought as third degree offenses, which can result in up to 5 years in state prison.
It is also unlawful for a person to distribute prescription drugs in Belmar without a license to do so.  As with possession charges, the penalties are based on the amount distributed: second degree charges for 100 doses or more, third degree charges for 5 to 100 doses, fourth degree charges for four or less doses. These charges all expose a defendant to the potential for considerable time in jail, ranging from 18 months to 10 years for each charge.
The law also prohibits forgery of prescription scripts and prescription drug fraud in Belmar, both crimes of the third degree.  If convicted, defendants face up to 5 years in state prison.
Distribution and Possession with Intent to Distribute
Generally, allegations involving distribution of drugs in Belmar present more significant penalties.  Penalties are often determined based on the type and amount of the drugs possessed.  Also, consequences may be increased based on the location of the defendant at the time of arrest.  For instance, if a defendant is found within a certain distance from a school or public park in Belmar, the penalties are enhanced.
We are experienced New Jersey drug possession attorneys.  We have handled many drug cases in Belmar and throughout New Jersey.    We will defend your rights and vigorously pursue all available legal defenses.  Al Mollo recently appeared on television as an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, drug cases in Belmar.  The right Belmar drug lawyer can make all the difference.  Contact our offices for a free consultation.  You can reach us at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com.  Thank you.
 
21 Jan
Posted by Mollo Law Firm
   
 

 

Charged with Shoplifting in Holmdel? 

Shoplifting is type of theft that occurs when a person enters a store and steals goods with no intention of paying. In most cases, shoplifting is discovered once the person tries to exit the store and security or an alarm detector detects merchandise that has not been purchased.  Many people charged with New Jersey shoplifting crimes are good, productive citizens who made an unfortunate mistake.  These people deserve a second chance.  Additionally, not everyone accused of shoplifting is guilty. As such, it is imperative that you have an experienced Holmdel, NJ shoplifting attorney on your side.  Indeed, the right shoplifting lawyer can make all the difference.

Fighting Holmdel shoplifting cases can be challenging.  Holmdel shoplifting cases often involve strong evidence, such as video surveillance, that places the defendant at the scene. There may also be witnesses, including store employees or security personnel, who may testify at the time of trial. Finally, the merchandise itself may be used as evidence if it was found on the defendant’s body or in their vehicle.

An experienced Holmdel shoplifting lawyer can evaluate all of the evidence and develop case strategy, even if it seems as though there is a slim chance of avoiding a conviction. For instance, your attorney can challenge witness testimony, the constitutionality of the search and how the evidence was processed by law enforcement.  An experienced Holmdel shoplifting lawyer will examine the store video, interview witnesses and conduct an independent investigation.  An experienced shoplifting attorney will demand proof of every retail charge and ensure that police followed all rules when conducting their investigation.

Fines & Monetary Penalties

The penalties for New Jersey shoplifting charges are potentially devastating.

Fines:

Second Degree Shoplifting: Fine of up to $150,000
Third Degree Shoplifting: Fine of up to $15,000
Fourth Degree Shoplifting: Fine of up to $10,000
Disorderly Persons Shoplifting: Fine of up to $1,000

Jail:

Second Degree Shoplifting: Up to 10 Years in Jail
Third Degree Shoplifting: Up to 5 Years in Jail
Fourth Degree Shoplifting: Up to 18 Months in Jail
Disorderly Persons Shoplifting: Up to 6 Months in Jail

 

* Anyone convicted of three or more Shoplifting offenses must serve 90 days in jail.

Community Service:

First Offense Shoplifting: 10 Days Community Service
Second Offense Shoplifting: 15 Days Community Service
Third Offense Shoplifting: 25 Days Community Service

 

New Jersey Shoplifting Penalties:

Crime Degree
Shoplifting merchandise with a total combined value less than $200.00 Disorderly persons shoplifting
Shoplifting merchandise with a total combined value of $200-$500 Crime of the fourth degree
Shoplifting merchandise with a total combined value of $500-$75,0000 Crime of the third degree
Shoplifting merchandise with a total combined value of $75,000 or greater Crime of the second degree

The Mollo Law Firm handles shoplifting cases in Holmdel and throughout New Jersey.   If you have been charged with Shoplifting in Holmdel, or anywhere in New Jersey, it is important that you have an experienced New Jersey Shoplifting attorney.  Al Mollo recently appeared on televisionas an authority on Municipal Court cases including, but not limited to, shoplifting cases in Holmdel.  The right Holmdel shoplifting lawyer can make all the difference.  Contact our offices for a free consultation.  You can reach us at (732) 747-1844 or e-mail Al Mollo directly at amollo@mollolawfirm.com.  You may also visit our website at www.mollolawfirm.com.  Thank you.

 
© 2011 Al Mollo - Attorney at Law/ Mollo Law Firm. All rights reserved..
Site Maintained by Computer Doctors
Designed by Website Design